Review



human integrin β2 cdna  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc human integrin β2 cdna
    Figure 1. <t>Integrin</t> <t>β2</t> can be substituted by its human homolog in mouse Hoxb8 FL cells. (A) Scheme of workflow. Hoxb8 FL cells were generated from bone marrow of integrin β2-deficient mice and retrovirally transduced with mouse or human integrin β2. Human/mouse integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Surface expression of different integrin subunits and cell markers on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from control (β2+/+), integrin β2 ko (β2−/−), and human or mouse integrin β2-rescued integrin β2−/−(β2−/−/hβ2 and β2−/−/mβ2) Hoxb8 FL cells assessed by FACS analysis. (C) Integrin β2 surface expression levels on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 FL cells retrovirally transduced with human integrin β2 (β2−/−/hβ2) compared to PMNs isolated from human blood. (D) Static adhesion of untreated, TNFα-treated, or PMA-treated Hoxb8 FL-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 neutrophils on ICAM1. N = 4. Individual data points of the 4 independent experiments are shown. (E,F) Adhesion (E) and rolling velocities (F) of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 Hoxb8 FL cells in flow chambers coated with ICAM1 and P-selectin with or without CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 10/11 chambers with CXCL1 (rolling and adhesion); N = 3/4 without CXCL1 (adhesion). (G) Neutrophil-like β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 cells plated on a P-selectin-, ICAM1-, and CXCL1-coated surface for 10 min. Scale bar: 100 µm. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
    Human Integrin β2 Cdna, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human integrin β2 cdna/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 4 article reviews
    human integrin β2 cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation."

    Article Title: Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation.

    Journal: Cells

    doi: 10.3390/cells11091532

    Figure 1. Integrin β2 can be substituted by its human homolog in mouse Hoxb8 FL cells. (A) Scheme of workflow. Hoxb8 FL cells were generated from bone marrow of integrin β2-deficient mice and retrovirally transduced with mouse or human integrin β2. Human/mouse integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Surface expression of different integrin subunits and cell markers on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from control (β2+/+), integrin β2 ko (β2−/−), and human or mouse integrin β2-rescued integrin β2−/−(β2−/−/hβ2 and β2−/−/mβ2) Hoxb8 FL cells assessed by FACS analysis. (C) Integrin β2 surface expression levels on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 FL cells retrovirally transduced with human integrin β2 (β2−/−/hβ2) compared to PMNs isolated from human blood. (D) Static adhesion of untreated, TNFα-treated, or PMA-treated Hoxb8 FL-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 neutrophils on ICAM1. N = 4. Individual data points of the 4 independent experiments are shown. (E,F) Adhesion (E) and rolling velocities (F) of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 Hoxb8 FL cells in flow chambers coated with ICAM1 and P-selectin with or without CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 10/11 chambers with CXCL1 (rolling and adhesion); N = 3/4 without CXCL1 (adhesion). (G) Neutrophil-like β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 cells plated on a P-selectin-, ICAM1-, and CXCL1-coated surface for 10 min. Scale bar: 100 µm. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 1. Integrin β2 can be substituted by its human homolog in mouse Hoxb8 FL cells. (A) Scheme of workflow. Hoxb8 FL cells were generated from bone marrow of integrin β2-deficient mice and retrovirally transduced with mouse or human integrin β2. Human/mouse integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Surface expression of different integrin subunits and cell markers on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from control (β2+/+), integrin β2 ko (β2−/−), and human or mouse integrin β2-rescued integrin β2−/−(β2−/−/hβ2 and β2−/−/mβ2) Hoxb8 FL cells assessed by FACS analysis. (C) Integrin β2 surface expression levels on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 FL cells retrovirally transduced with human integrin β2 (β2−/−/hβ2) compared to PMNs isolated from human blood. (D) Static adhesion of untreated, TNFα-treated, or PMA-treated Hoxb8 FL-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 neutrophils on ICAM1. N = 4. Individual data points of the 4 independent experiments are shown. (E,F) Adhesion (E) and rolling velocities (F) of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 Hoxb8 FL cells in flow chambers coated with ICAM1 and P-selectin with or without CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 10/11 chambers with CXCL1 (rolling and adhesion); N = 3/4 without CXCL1 (adhesion). (G) Neutrophil-like β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 cells plated on a P-selectin-, ICAM1-, and CXCL1-coated surface for 10 min. Scale bar: 100 µm. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Generated, Transduction, Expressing, Control, Isolation, Derivative Assay, Shear

    Figure 2. Expression of human integrin β2 rescues spreading and adhesion defects in mouse integrin β2 knockout macrophages. (A) Adhesion of integrin β2−/−and human or mouse integrin β2 ex- pressing integrin β2−/−macrophages to ICAM1 and fibronectin in relation to control macrophages. N = 5. Individual data points represent the 5 independent experiments. (B) Spreading of control, integrin β2−/−, and human or mouse integrin β2 expressing integrin β2−/−macrophages to ICAM1 and fibronectin assessed 2 h after plating. N = 3 independent experiments, shown as individual data points. (C) Hoxb8-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 macrophages plated on an ICAM1- or fibronectin-coated surface for 2 h. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Alignment of the amino acid sequence of the mouse and human β2 integrin cytoplasmic tails. Talin-binding NPLF and kindlin- binding NPKF motives are highlighted in red. MP, membrane proximal; MD, membrane distal. (E) Control, integrin β2−/−, and human or mouse integrin β2 expressing integrin β2−/−
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Expression of human integrin β2 rescues spreading and adhesion defects in mouse integrin β2 knockout macrophages. (A) Adhesion of integrin β2−/−and human or mouse integrin β2 ex- pressing integrin β2−/−macrophages to ICAM1 and fibronectin in relation to control macrophages. N = 5. Individual data points represent the 5 independent experiments. (B) Spreading of control, integrin β2−/−, and human or mouse integrin β2 expressing integrin β2−/−macrophages to ICAM1 and fibronectin assessed 2 h after plating. N = 3 independent experiments, shown as individual data points. (C) Hoxb8-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 macrophages plated on an ICAM1- or fibronectin-coated surface for 2 h. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Alignment of the amino acid sequence of the mouse and human β2 integrin cytoplasmic tails. Talin-binding NPLF and kindlin- binding NPKF motives are highlighted in red. MP, membrane proximal; MD, membrane distal. (E) Control, integrin β2−/−, and human or mouse integrin β2 expressing integrin β2−/−

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Knock-Out, Control, Derivative Assay, Sequencing, Binding Assay, Membrane

    Figure 3. Expression of human integrin β2 in mouse integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 cells allows assessment of integrin activity using conformation-specific anti-human integrin β2 antibodies. (A,B) FACS analyses of integrin β2 activation of Hoxb8-derived neutrophils expressing human or mouse integrin β2 by measuring staining intensities of conformation-specific antibodies mAb24 (A) and KIM127 (B) either untreated, EDTA-treated, or in response to TNFα, fMLP, or PMA. (C,D) Relative mAb24 (C) and KIM127 (D) binding to resting or EDTA-, TNFα-, fMLP-, or PMA-stimulated Hoxb8-derived neutrophil-like cells upon treatment with DMSO, the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor Wortmannin, the phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U-73122, or the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor Gö6983. N = 7 (mAb24) or 5 (KIM127) independent experiments, shown as individual data points. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. Expression of human integrin β2 in mouse integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 cells allows assessment of integrin activity using conformation-specific anti-human integrin β2 antibodies. (A,B) FACS analyses of integrin β2 activation of Hoxb8-derived neutrophils expressing human or mouse integrin β2 by measuring staining intensities of conformation-specific antibodies mAb24 (A) and KIM127 (B) either untreated, EDTA-treated, or in response to TNFα, fMLP, or PMA. (C,D) Relative mAb24 (C) and KIM127 (D) binding to resting or EDTA-, TNFα-, fMLP-, or PMA-stimulated Hoxb8-derived neutrophil-like cells upon treatment with DMSO, the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor Wortmannin, the phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U-73122, or the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor Gö6983. N = 7 (mAb24) or 5 (KIM127) independent experiments, shown as individual data points. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Derivative Assay, Staining, Binding Assay

    Figure 4. Both talin1 and kindlin3 are required for β2 integrin activation. (A) Scheme of work- flow. Talin1, kindlin3, and talin1/kindlin3 double-deficient Hoxb8 FL cells were generated via the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Single cell clones were screened for talin1 and kindlin3 expression. Four clones per genotype were subjected to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated integrin β2 ablation and retrovirally trans- duced to express human integrin β2. Mouse integrin β2-negative and human integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Western blot analysis of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from different human integrin β2 expressing Hoxb8 single cell clones, in which talin1 and/or kindlin3 were ablated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. GAPDH served as loading control. (C,D) Relative mAb24 (C) and KIM127 (D) binding to neutrophil-like cells derived from Hoxb8 single cell clones, expressing human integrin β2 and lacking talin1 and/or kindlin3 expression. N = 4 clones. Result of each clone is plotted as individual data point. All values are given as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Both talin1 and kindlin3 are required for β2 integrin activation. (A) Scheme of work- flow. Talin1, kindlin3, and talin1/kindlin3 double-deficient Hoxb8 FL cells were generated via the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Single cell clones were screened for talin1 and kindlin3 expression. Four clones per genotype were subjected to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated integrin β2 ablation and retrovirally trans- duced to express human integrin β2. Mouse integrin β2-negative and human integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Western blot analysis of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from different human integrin β2 expressing Hoxb8 single cell clones, in which talin1 and/or kindlin3 were ablated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. GAPDH served as loading control. (C,D) Relative mAb24 (C) and KIM127 (D) binding to neutrophil-like cells derived from Hoxb8 single cell clones, expressing human integrin β2 and lacking talin1 and/or kindlin3 expression. N = 4 clones. Result of each clone is plotted as individual data point. All values are given as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Generated, CRISPR, Clone Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Binding Assay, Derivative Assay

    Figure 5. Kindlin3 is dispensable for P-selectin-induced integrin αLβ2-mediated slow rolling but required for chemokine-induced slower rolling. (A–C) Adhesion (A), rolling velocities (B), and rolling velocities after LFA-1 blocking (C) of Hoxb8 cell-derived PMN-LCs in flow chambers coated with ICAM1, P-selectin, and CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 12–16 (A,B) and 6–9 (C) flow chambers. (D) Rolling velocities of PMN-LCs on ICAM1- and P-selectin-coated surfaces (without CXCL1) under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 8–9 flow chambers. Cells were differentiated from different single cell clones, in which talin1 and/or kindlin3 were ablated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Rolling velocities are shown as cumulative distribution of the velocities of approximately 500 (B), 300 (C), and 400 (D) cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 5. Kindlin3 is dispensable for P-selectin-induced integrin αLβ2-mediated slow rolling but required for chemokine-induced slower rolling. (A–C) Adhesion (A), rolling velocities (B), and rolling velocities after LFA-1 blocking (C) of Hoxb8 cell-derived PMN-LCs in flow chambers coated with ICAM1, P-selectin, and CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 12–16 (A,B) and 6–9 (C) flow chambers. (D) Rolling velocities of PMN-LCs on ICAM1- and P-selectin-coated surfaces (without CXCL1) under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 8–9 flow chambers. Cells were differentiated from different single cell clones, in which talin1 and/or kindlin3 were ablated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Rolling velocities are shown as cumulative distribution of the velocities of approximately 500 (B), 300 (C), and 400 (D) cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Blocking Assay, Derivative Assay, Shear, Clone Assay, CRISPR

    Figure 6. Talin and/or kindlin3 binding-deficient human integrin β2 exhibit impaired integrin ac- tivation. (A) Scheme of the integrin β2 cytoplasmic domain, which binds talin1 via a membrane proximal NPLF motif and kindlin3 via a membrane-distal NPKF and a TTT motif (left). Muta- tion of these motifs to NPLA and AAA prevent talin1 and kindlin3 binding, respectively (right). (B) Relative mAb24 binding to neutrophil-like cells derived from Hoxb8 cells expressing human wild-type integrin β2, mutant integrin β2 F/A (F754A), mutant integrin β2 TTT/AAA (T758A, T759A, T760A), or double-mutant integrin F/A TTT/AAA in response to TNFα, CXCL1, fMLP, and PMA or left untreated. N = 5 experiments indicated as individual data points. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 6. Talin and/or kindlin3 binding-deficient human integrin β2 exhibit impaired integrin ac- tivation. (A) Scheme of the integrin β2 cytoplasmic domain, which binds talin1 via a membrane proximal NPLF motif and kindlin3 via a membrane-distal NPKF and a TTT motif (left). Muta- tion of these motifs to NPLA and AAA prevent talin1 and kindlin3 binding, respectively (right). (B) Relative mAb24 binding to neutrophil-like cells derived from Hoxb8 cells expressing human wild-type integrin β2, mutant integrin β2 F/A (F754A), mutant integrin β2 TTT/AAA (T758A, T759A, T760A), or double-mutant integrin F/A TTT/AAA in response to TNFα, CXCL1, fMLP, and PMA or left untreated. N = 5 experiments indicated as individual data points. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Membrane, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Mutagenesis

    Figure 7. Rapid CRISPR-based screening approach to study putative β2 integrin regulators. (A) Scheme
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 7. Rapid CRISPR-based screening approach to study putative β2 integrin regulators. (A) Scheme

    Techniques Used: CRISPR



    Similar Products

    93
    Addgene inc human integrin β2 cdna
    Figure 1. <t>Integrin</t> <t>β2</t> can be substituted by its human homolog in mouse Hoxb8 FL cells. (A) Scheme of workflow. Hoxb8 FL cells were generated from bone marrow of integrin β2-deficient mice and retrovirally transduced with mouse or human integrin β2. Human/mouse integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Surface expression of different integrin subunits and cell markers on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from control (β2+/+), integrin β2 ko (β2−/−), and human or mouse integrin β2-rescued integrin β2−/−(β2−/−/hβ2 and β2−/−/mβ2) Hoxb8 FL cells assessed by FACS analysis. (C) Integrin β2 surface expression levels on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 FL cells retrovirally transduced with human integrin β2 (β2−/−/hβ2) compared to PMNs isolated from human blood. (D) Static adhesion of untreated, TNFα-treated, or PMA-treated Hoxb8 FL-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 neutrophils on ICAM1. N = 4. Individual data points of the 4 independent experiments are shown. (E,F) Adhesion (E) and rolling velocities (F) of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 Hoxb8 FL cells in flow chambers coated with ICAM1 and P-selectin with or without CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 10/11 chambers with CXCL1 (rolling and adhesion); N = 3/4 without CXCL1 (adhesion). (G) Neutrophil-like β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 cells plated on a P-selectin-, ICAM1-, and CXCL1-coated surface for 10 min. Scale bar: 100 µm. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
    Human Integrin β2 Cdna, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human integrin β2 cdna/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human integrin β2 cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Addgene inc pmigr containing mouse or human integrin β2 cdna
    Figure 1. <t>Integrin</t> <t>β2</t> can be substituted by its human homolog in mouse Hoxb8 FL cells. (A) Scheme of workflow. Hoxb8 FL cells were generated from bone marrow of integrin β2-deficient mice and retrovirally transduced with mouse or human integrin β2. Human/mouse integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Surface expression of different integrin subunits and cell markers on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from control (β2+/+), integrin β2 ko (β2−/−), and human or mouse integrin β2-rescued integrin β2−/−(β2−/−/hβ2 and β2−/−/mβ2) Hoxb8 FL cells assessed by FACS analysis. (C) Integrin β2 surface expression levels on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 FL cells retrovirally transduced with human integrin β2 (β2−/−/hβ2) compared to PMNs isolated from human blood. (D) Static adhesion of untreated, TNFα-treated, or PMA-treated Hoxb8 FL-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 neutrophils on ICAM1. N = 4. Individual data points of the 4 independent experiments are shown. (E,F) Adhesion (E) and rolling velocities (F) of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 Hoxb8 FL cells in flow chambers coated with ICAM1 and P-selectin with or without CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 10/11 chambers with CXCL1 (rolling and adhesion); N = 3/4 without CXCL1 (adhesion). (G) Neutrophil-like β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 cells plated on a P-selectin-, ICAM1-, and CXCL1-coated surface for 10 min. Scale bar: 100 µm. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
    Pmigr Containing Mouse Or Human Integrin β2 Cdna, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pmigr containing mouse or human integrin β2 cdna/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pmigr containing mouse or human integrin β2 cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Figure 1. Integrin β2 can be substituted by its human homolog in mouse Hoxb8 FL cells. (A) Scheme of workflow. Hoxb8 FL cells were generated from bone marrow of integrin β2-deficient mice and retrovirally transduced with mouse or human integrin β2. Human/mouse integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Surface expression of different integrin subunits and cell markers on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from control (β2+/+), integrin β2 ko (β2−/−), and human or mouse integrin β2-rescued integrin β2−/−(β2−/−/hβ2 and β2−/−/mβ2) Hoxb8 FL cells assessed by FACS analysis. (C) Integrin β2 surface expression levels on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 FL cells retrovirally transduced with human integrin β2 (β2−/−/hβ2) compared to PMNs isolated from human blood. (D) Static adhesion of untreated, TNFα-treated, or PMA-treated Hoxb8 FL-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 neutrophils on ICAM1. N = 4. Individual data points of the 4 independent experiments are shown. (E,F) Adhesion (E) and rolling velocities (F) of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 Hoxb8 FL cells in flow chambers coated with ICAM1 and P-selectin with or without CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 10/11 chambers with CXCL1 (rolling and adhesion); N = 3/4 without CXCL1 (adhesion). (G) Neutrophil-like β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 cells plated on a P-selectin-, ICAM1-, and CXCL1-coated surface for 10 min. Scale bar: 100 µm. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation.

    doi: 10.3390/cells11091532

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. Integrin β2 can be substituted by its human homolog in mouse Hoxb8 FL cells. (A) Scheme of workflow. Hoxb8 FL cells were generated from bone marrow of integrin β2-deficient mice and retrovirally transduced with mouse or human integrin β2. Human/mouse integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Surface expression of different integrin subunits and cell markers on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from control (β2+/+), integrin β2 ko (β2−/−), and human or mouse integrin β2-rescued integrin β2−/−(β2−/−/hβ2 and β2−/−/mβ2) Hoxb8 FL cells assessed by FACS analysis. (C) Integrin β2 surface expression levels on neutrophil-like cells differentiated from integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 FL cells retrovirally transduced with human integrin β2 (β2−/−/hβ2) compared to PMNs isolated from human blood. (D) Static adhesion of untreated, TNFα-treated, or PMA-treated Hoxb8 FL-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 neutrophils on ICAM1. N = 4. Individual data points of the 4 independent experiments are shown. (E,F) Adhesion (E) and rolling velocities (F) of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 Hoxb8 FL cells in flow chambers coated with ICAM1 and P-selectin with or without CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 10/11 chambers with CXCL1 (rolling and adhesion); N = 3/4 without CXCL1 (adhesion). (G) Neutrophil-like β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 cells plated on a P-selectin-, ICAM1-, and CXCL1-coated surface for 10 min. Scale bar: 100 µm. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse or human integrin β2 cDNA were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) and subcloned into pMIGR via XhoI and SalI restriction sites.

    Techniques: Generated, Transduction, Expressing, Control, Isolation, Derivative Assay, Shear

    Figure 2. Expression of human integrin β2 rescues spreading and adhesion defects in mouse integrin β2 knockout macrophages. (A) Adhesion of integrin β2−/−and human or mouse integrin β2 ex- pressing integrin β2−/−macrophages to ICAM1 and fibronectin in relation to control macrophages. N = 5. Individual data points represent the 5 independent experiments. (B) Spreading of control, integrin β2−/−, and human or mouse integrin β2 expressing integrin β2−/−macrophages to ICAM1 and fibronectin assessed 2 h after plating. N = 3 independent experiments, shown as individual data points. (C) Hoxb8-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 macrophages plated on an ICAM1- or fibronectin-coated surface for 2 h. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Alignment of the amino acid sequence of the mouse and human β2 integrin cytoplasmic tails. Talin-binding NPLF and kindlin- binding NPKF motives are highlighted in red. MP, membrane proximal; MD, membrane distal. (E) Control, integrin β2−/−, and human or mouse integrin β2 expressing integrin β2−/−

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation.

    doi: 10.3390/cells11091532

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Expression of human integrin β2 rescues spreading and adhesion defects in mouse integrin β2 knockout macrophages. (A) Adhesion of integrin β2−/−and human or mouse integrin β2 ex- pressing integrin β2−/−macrophages to ICAM1 and fibronectin in relation to control macrophages. N = 5. Individual data points represent the 5 independent experiments. (B) Spreading of control, integrin β2−/−, and human or mouse integrin β2 expressing integrin β2−/−macrophages to ICAM1 and fibronectin assessed 2 h after plating. N = 3 independent experiments, shown as individual data points. (C) Hoxb8-derived β2+/+, β2−/−, β2−/−/hβ2, and β2−/−/mβ2 macrophages plated on an ICAM1- or fibronectin-coated surface for 2 h. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Alignment of the amino acid sequence of the mouse and human β2 integrin cytoplasmic tails. Talin-binding NPLF and kindlin- binding NPKF motives are highlighted in red. MP, membrane proximal; MD, membrane distal. (E) Control, integrin β2−/−, and human or mouse integrin β2 expressing integrin β2−/−

    Article Snippet: Mouse or human integrin β2 cDNA were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) and subcloned into pMIGR via XhoI and SalI restriction sites.

    Techniques: Expressing, Knock-Out, Control, Derivative Assay, Sequencing, Binding Assay, Membrane

    Figure 3. Expression of human integrin β2 in mouse integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 cells allows assessment of integrin activity using conformation-specific anti-human integrin β2 antibodies. (A,B) FACS analyses of integrin β2 activation of Hoxb8-derived neutrophils expressing human or mouse integrin β2 by measuring staining intensities of conformation-specific antibodies mAb24 (A) and KIM127 (B) either untreated, EDTA-treated, or in response to TNFα, fMLP, or PMA. (C,D) Relative mAb24 (C) and KIM127 (D) binding to resting or EDTA-, TNFα-, fMLP-, or PMA-stimulated Hoxb8-derived neutrophil-like cells upon treatment with DMSO, the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor Wortmannin, the phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U-73122, or the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor Gö6983. N = 7 (mAb24) or 5 (KIM127) independent experiments, shown as individual data points. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation.

    doi: 10.3390/cells11091532

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Expression of human integrin β2 in mouse integrin β2−/−Hoxb8 cells allows assessment of integrin activity using conformation-specific anti-human integrin β2 antibodies. (A,B) FACS analyses of integrin β2 activation of Hoxb8-derived neutrophils expressing human or mouse integrin β2 by measuring staining intensities of conformation-specific antibodies mAb24 (A) and KIM127 (B) either untreated, EDTA-treated, or in response to TNFα, fMLP, or PMA. (C,D) Relative mAb24 (C) and KIM127 (D) binding to resting or EDTA-, TNFα-, fMLP-, or PMA-stimulated Hoxb8-derived neutrophil-like cells upon treatment with DMSO, the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor Wortmannin, the phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U-73122, or the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor Gö6983. N = 7 (mAb24) or 5 (KIM127) independent experiments, shown as individual data points. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse or human integrin β2 cDNA were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) and subcloned into pMIGR via XhoI and SalI restriction sites.

    Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Derivative Assay, Staining, Binding Assay

    Figure 4. Both talin1 and kindlin3 are required for β2 integrin activation. (A) Scheme of work- flow. Talin1, kindlin3, and talin1/kindlin3 double-deficient Hoxb8 FL cells were generated via the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Single cell clones were screened for talin1 and kindlin3 expression. Four clones per genotype were subjected to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated integrin β2 ablation and retrovirally trans- duced to express human integrin β2. Mouse integrin β2-negative and human integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Western blot analysis of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from different human integrin β2 expressing Hoxb8 single cell clones, in which talin1 and/or kindlin3 were ablated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. GAPDH served as loading control. (C,D) Relative mAb24 (C) and KIM127 (D) binding to neutrophil-like cells derived from Hoxb8 single cell clones, expressing human integrin β2 and lacking talin1 and/or kindlin3 expression. N = 4 clones. Result of each clone is plotted as individual data point. All values are given as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation.

    doi: 10.3390/cells11091532

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. Both talin1 and kindlin3 are required for β2 integrin activation. (A) Scheme of work- flow. Talin1, kindlin3, and talin1/kindlin3 double-deficient Hoxb8 FL cells were generated via the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Single cell clones were screened for talin1 and kindlin3 expression. Four clones per genotype were subjected to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated integrin β2 ablation and retrovirally trans- duced to express human integrin β2. Mouse integrin β2-negative and human integrin β2-positive cells were FACS-sorted. (B) Western blot analysis of neutrophil-like cells differentiated from different human integrin β2 expressing Hoxb8 single cell clones, in which talin1 and/or kindlin3 were ablated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. GAPDH served as loading control. (C,D) Relative mAb24 (C) and KIM127 (D) binding to neutrophil-like cells derived from Hoxb8 single cell clones, expressing human integrin β2 and lacking talin1 and/or kindlin3 expression. N = 4 clones. Result of each clone is plotted as individual data point. All values are given as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse or human integrin β2 cDNA were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) and subcloned into pMIGR via XhoI and SalI restriction sites.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Generated, CRISPR, Clone Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Binding Assay, Derivative Assay

    Figure 5. Kindlin3 is dispensable for P-selectin-induced integrin αLβ2-mediated slow rolling but required for chemokine-induced slower rolling. (A–C) Adhesion (A), rolling velocities (B), and rolling velocities after LFA-1 blocking (C) of Hoxb8 cell-derived PMN-LCs in flow chambers coated with ICAM1, P-selectin, and CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 12–16 (A,B) and 6–9 (C) flow chambers. (D) Rolling velocities of PMN-LCs on ICAM1- and P-selectin-coated surfaces (without CXCL1) under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 8–9 flow chambers. Cells were differentiated from different single cell clones, in which talin1 and/or kindlin3 were ablated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Rolling velocities are shown as cumulative distribution of the velocities of approximately 500 (B), 300 (C), and 400 (D) cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation.

    doi: 10.3390/cells11091532

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Kindlin3 is dispensable for P-selectin-induced integrin αLβ2-mediated slow rolling but required for chemokine-induced slower rolling. (A–C) Adhesion (A), rolling velocities (B), and rolling velocities after LFA-1 blocking (C) of Hoxb8 cell-derived PMN-LCs in flow chambers coated with ICAM1, P-selectin, and CXCL1 under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 12–16 (A,B) and 6–9 (C) flow chambers. (D) Rolling velocities of PMN-LCs on ICAM1- and P-selectin-coated surfaces (without CXCL1) under constant shear rate of 1 dyn/cm2. N = 8–9 flow chambers. Cells were differentiated from different single cell clones, in which talin1 and/or kindlin3 were ablated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Rolling velocities are shown as cumulative distribution of the velocities of approximately 500 (B), 300 (C), and 400 (D) cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse or human integrin β2 cDNA were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) and subcloned into pMIGR via XhoI and SalI restriction sites.

    Techniques: Blocking Assay, Derivative Assay, Shear, Clone Assay, CRISPR

    Figure 6. Talin and/or kindlin3 binding-deficient human integrin β2 exhibit impaired integrin ac- tivation. (A) Scheme of the integrin β2 cytoplasmic domain, which binds talin1 via a membrane proximal NPLF motif and kindlin3 via a membrane-distal NPKF and a TTT motif (left). Muta- tion of these motifs to NPLA and AAA prevent talin1 and kindlin3 binding, respectively (right). (B) Relative mAb24 binding to neutrophil-like cells derived from Hoxb8 cells expressing human wild-type integrin β2, mutant integrin β2 F/A (F754A), mutant integrin β2 TTT/AAA (T758A, T759A, T760A), or double-mutant integrin F/A TTT/AAA in response to TNFα, CXCL1, fMLP, and PMA or left untreated. N = 5 experiments indicated as individual data points. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation.

    doi: 10.3390/cells11091532

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. Talin and/or kindlin3 binding-deficient human integrin β2 exhibit impaired integrin ac- tivation. (A) Scheme of the integrin β2 cytoplasmic domain, which binds talin1 via a membrane proximal NPLF motif and kindlin3 via a membrane-distal NPKF and a TTT motif (left). Muta- tion of these motifs to NPLA and AAA prevent talin1 and kindlin3 binding, respectively (right). (B) Relative mAb24 binding to neutrophil-like cells derived from Hoxb8 cells expressing human wild-type integrin β2, mutant integrin β2 F/A (F754A), mutant integrin β2 TTT/AAA (T758A, T759A, T760A), or double-mutant integrin F/A TTT/AAA in response to TNFα, CXCL1, fMLP, and PMA or left untreated. N = 5 experiments indicated as individual data points. All values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse or human integrin β2 cDNA were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) and subcloned into pMIGR via XhoI and SalI restriction sites.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Membrane, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Mutagenesis

    Figure 7. Rapid CRISPR-based screening approach to study putative β2 integrin regulators. (A) Scheme

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: Humanized β2 Integrin-Expressing Hoxb8 Cells Serve as Model to Study Integrin Activation.

    doi: 10.3390/cells11091532

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 7. Rapid CRISPR-based screening approach to study putative β2 integrin regulators. (A) Scheme

    Article Snippet: Mouse or human integrin β2 cDNA were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) and subcloned into pMIGR via XhoI and SalI restriction sites.

    Techniques: CRISPR